DEV Community

Cover image for ARM-based SBCs – NXP & Rockchip Industrial Boards
Kevin zhang
Kevin zhang

Posted on β€’ Edited on

ARM-based SBCs – NXP & Rockchip Industrial Boards

πŸ” ARM-based SBCs – NXP & Rockchip Industrial Boards

When it comes to building custom industrial systems or embedded HMI panels, selecting the right ARM-based single-board computer (SBC) is one of the most critical architectural decisions. For years, NXP has been the go-to choice for stability and long-term support. But Rockchip, known for its performance-to-cost ratio, is gaining ground fast β€” especially in smart retail, IoT gateways, and industrial displays.

In this post, we compare NXP and Rockchip SBCs through the lens of real-world industrial deployments.


βš™οΈ Common Industrial Use Cases for ARM SBCs

Whether you're designing:

  • A factory control panel
  • An EV charger touchscreen
  • A medical device UI
  • An edge AI device
  • A KNX-based building controller

You’ll likely need:

  • πŸ“¦ Reliable SoC with guaranteed supply chain support
  • πŸ“Ί Multi-display support: MIPI DSI, LVDS, RGB, HDMI, eDP
  • ❄️ Extended temperature range (–20 to +70Β°C or wider)
  • πŸ”‹ Low power consumption
  • πŸ“² BSP for Linux or Android, OTA update support

Both Rockchip and NXP platforms check these boxes β€” but in very different ways.


πŸ€– Rockchip: High Performance, Multimedia, and Android Flexibility

Rockchip SoCs like RK3566, RK3568, and PX30 offer:

  • ARM Cortex-A55 or A72 quad-core CPUs
  • 4K GPU rendering + VPU hardware decoding
  • Native Android 11/12/13 support
  • NPU (neural processor) in RK3568, RK3588
  • MIPI DSI / eDP / HDMI / LVDS interfaces

These features make them ideal for:

  • Smart kiosks
  • Multimedia-rich POS terminals
  • Industrial HMI with touch + video
  • Low-cost AI edge inference gateways

Explore an in-depth SoC comparison πŸ‘‰

πŸ”— Rockchip vs NXP – A Deep Dive for Product Teams


🧱 NXP: Longevity and Certified Industrial Platforms

If your application needs:

  • Long-term availability (10+ years)
  • Automotive or medical certifications
  • Rich documentation and BSP maturity
  • Advanced security: TrustZone, Secure Boot, AES
  • Mainline Linux compatibility

Then NXP’s i.MX6/i.MX8/i.MX93 series is still an excellent choice.

Typical industries choosing NXP include:

  • 🚘 Automotive Tier 1/2
  • πŸ₯ Medical equipment
  • βš™οΈ Industrial control & automation
  • πŸ“‘ Secure edge gateways

🧩 Practical Design Consideration: NXP vs Rockchip

Feature Rockchip SBC (e.g., PX30/RK3568) NXP SBC (e.g., i.MX8M)
Android BSP Support Excellent (Rockchip SDK) Varies (Yocto Android)
Video Capabilities Strong (4K VPU/GPU) Adequate
Longevity 5–7 years 10–15 years
Power Consumption Moderate Lower (some series)
Price / Performance High value Higher BOM
Certifications (ISO, IEC) Optional / project-based More widely supported

πŸ› οΈ Real-World Use Case: Smart EV Charging Panel

We recently deployed a PX30-based custom HMI solution:

  • βœ… 7-inch IPS TFT with capacitive touch
  • βœ… Android 11, OTA update via Wi-Fi/4G
  • βœ… Weatherproof enclosure (IP65)
  • βœ… Supports KNX and Modbus over RS485

Compared to a previous NXP i.MX6Q design, PX30 helped us:

  • Cut BOM cost by 28%
  • Improve boot time by 1.5Γ—
  • Support richer graphics & smoother UI

GitHub examples πŸ‘‰

πŸ”— rocktech-tft-display-configs


πŸ“· Hardware in Action

Rockchip SBC with 5-inch TFT Display

πŸ“˜ More docs and DTS files:

πŸ‘‰ kevin109.github.io


πŸš€ Final Thoughts

There’s no one-size-fits-all SBC β€” your choice depends on priorities:

  • Choose Rockchip for fast UI, cost-effective Android/Linux, rich media.
  • Choose NXP for long-term stability, certifications, and security.

We build custom SBCs, embedded Android platforms, and industrial-grade TFT LCD modules .


βœ‰οΈ Questions? Happy to connect and share more insights.

Top comments (2)

Collapse
Β 
dotallio profile image
Dotallio β€’

Super helpful breakdown! Have you run into any challenges with mainline Linux updates or certifications on newer Rockchip boards?

Collapse
Β 
kevinzhang109 profile image
Kevin zhang β€’

Yes, for the PX30 SoC, we originally used Android and Buildroot with kernel 4.4. Now both have been updated to kernel 5.10. Upgrading the kernel takes a lot of time to debug drivers and make the system stable.